Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 35 · DO #1005 · 319_Love_Bx2FF50r

Collection
Áskell Löve (1916–1994) papers
Item/Folder
Yugoslavian Trip and Incident (11 of 15), 1970–1973
Digital Object
DO #1005, page 35
Collection-level dates
1950–1987
Open PDF at page 35 ↗

Page transcription

535

HEILBORN, O. 1936: The mechanics of so-called secondary association between chromosomes. - Hereditas 22: 167 - 188.
- 1937: Notes on chromosome associations. - Cytologia, Fuji Jub. Vol.: 9 - 13.
- 1939: Chromosome studies in Cyperaceae. III - IV. - Hereditas 25: 224 - 241.
- 1941: Some chromosome numbers in Draba. - Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 35: 141 - 142.
- 1943: Inversions in Paris quadrifolia. - Hereditas 29: 498 - 499.
HEIMBURGER, M. 1959: Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Anemone. - Canad. J. Bot. 37: 507 - 612.
- 1962: Comparison of chromosome size in species of Anemone and their hybrids. - Chromosoma 13: 328 - 340.
HEISER, C. B. & WHITAKER, T. W. 1948: Chromosome number, polyploidy, and growth habit in California weeds. - Amer. J. Bot. 35: 179 - 187.
HEITZ, B. 1967: Graminées (Meliese). - Inf. Ann. Caryosyst. Cytogénét. 1: 1 - 22.
HEITZ, E. 1925: Beitrag zur Zytologie von Melandrium. - Planta 1: 241 - 259.
- 1926: Der Nachweis der Chromosomen. - Z. Botanik 18: 625 - 681.
- 1927: Über multiple und aberrante Chromosomenzahlen. - Abh. Naturwiss. Verein Hamburg 21: 45 - 57.
- 1931: Die Ursache der Gesetzmässigen Zahl, Lage, Form und Grösse der pflanzlichen Nukleolen. - Planta 12: 775 - 844.
- 1932: Die Herkunft der Chromozentren. Dritter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Beziehung zwischen Kernstruktur und qualitativer Verschiedenheit der Chromosomen in ihrer Längsrichtung. - Planta 18: 571 - 639.
HELMS, A. & JÖRGENSEN, C. A. 1925: Birkene paa Maglemose. - Bot. Tidsskr. 39: 57 - 134.
HENDRICKS, A. J. 1957: A revision of the genus Alisma (Dill.)L. - Amer. Midl. Naturalist 58: 470 - 493.
HENNEEN, W. K. 1962: Karyotype studies in Agropyron junceum, A. repens and their spontaneous hybrids. - Hereditas 48: 471 - 502.
- 1963: Meiosis in the interspecific hybrid Elymus farctus x Elymus repens (= Agropyron junceum x A. repens). - Hereditas 49: 107 - 118.
HERTZSCHE, W. 1960: Kreuzungen innerhalb der Gattung Festuca und zwischen den Gattungen Festuca und Lolium. - Z. Pflanzenzücht. 44: 301 - 318.
HESLOP-HARRISON, J. 1948: Field studies in Orchis L. I. The structure of dactylorhizid populations on certain islands in the inner and outer Hebrides. - Transact. Bot. Soc. Edinb. 35: 26 - 66.
- 1951: A comparison of some Swedish and British forms of Orchis maculata L. sens. lat. - Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 45: 608 - 635.
- 1953a: Studies in Orchis L. II. Orchis traunsteineri Saut. in the British Isles. - Watsonia 2: 371 - 381.
- 1953b: Microsporogenesis in some British Dactylorhizis hybrids. - Ann. Bot. (London) 17: 539 - 549.
- 1954: A synopsis of the Dactylorhizis of the British Isles. - Ber. Geobot. Forschungsinst. Rübel 1953: 53 - 82.
- 1956: Some observations on Dactylorhizis incarnata (L.) Vermiln. - Proc. Linn. Soc. London 166: 51 - 82.
- 1957: On the hybridization of the common spotted orchid, Dactylorhizis fuchsii (Druse) Vermiln. and D. purpurella (T. & T. A. Steph.) Vermiln. - Proc. Linn. Soc. London 167: 176 - 185.
HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. 1953a: Cytological studies in the genus Rubus. I. Chromosome numbers in the British flora. - New Phytol. 52: 22 - 39.
- 1953b: The genus Rubus in Northumberland and Durham. - Transact. Northern Naturalist Union 2: 29 - 39.
- 1953c: Nuphar intermedia Ledeb., a presumed relict hybrid. - Watsonia 3: 7 - 25.
HESS, H. E., LANDOLT, E. & HIRZEL, R. 1967: Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 1: Pteridophyta bis Caryophyllaceae. - Basel.