Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 125 · DO #1677 · 72_Degener_Bx6FF25_r

Collection
Otto Degener (1899–1988) papers
Item/Folder
National Science Foundation Papers III, 1958, n.d.
Digital Object
DO #1677, page 125
Collection-level dates
1915–1985, n.d.
Open PDF at page 125 ↗

Page transcription

68617 Crozier Drive, Waialua,
Oahu, Hawaii.
May 17, 1958.

Dear Dr. Smith:

Thank you for your kind letter of May 9 advising me that my proposal for "Further Botanical Exploration in the Hawaiian Islands" has been assigned to the appropriate office for processing.

Though I have been officially a staff member of the New York Botanical Garden this position is purely honorary and involves no salary or remuneration of any kind. Mrs. Degner and I receive no support from any organizations for any research projects whatsoever, nor have we applied for any.

Last February, after Book 5 of the Flora Hawaiensis was completed, (partly in celebration) we took a three weeks' "busman's holiday." On invitation of the Civil Aeronautics Administration, we flew at the Administration's expense to Canton Atoll on the Equator to be their guests. We were to observe and record the biological changes that transpired there since my stay on Canton in 1950-51. For this courtesy, Mrs. Degner, and I are to publish a brief report in the Atoll Research Bulletin. To write such a report will not materially interfere with our floral project in the Hawaiian Islands.

We absorb some of the expenses of our project ourselves when our funds permit. In addition, we send our books and herbarium specimens gratis to individuals and institutions in appreciation for favors in consulting literature or specimens not available to us in the Hawaiian Islands. Such welcome gifts stimulate prompt and careful replies, favors that otherwise would involve the purchase of costly books or photostats.

It may be of interest to note that herbarium specimens in recent years have gone to the institutions cryptically mentioned below:

N.Y.B.G. Cincinnati
Smithsonian Rutgers
Bishop Munich (Dr. Merxmüller)
Arnold Graz (Dr. Widder)
Kew Cornell
Univ. Mass. Bailey Hort.
Berlin Leiden
Vienna (Dr. Wimmer) U.C.L.A.
Chicago (Dr. Sherff) Denver
Mich. Stanford
Minn. Lund
British Mus. Butler
Geneve Brown
Mo. Notre Dame
Degner (Dr. Yuncker) Brisbane
Goteborg (Dr. Skottsberg) Sydney
Leiden Kagoshima
Ottowa Nagoya
Tokyo Kyoto

Gifts to Japanese institutions, for instance, were prompted by our desire for information on Cyperaceae; to Vienna, on Lobeliaceae; to De Pauw, on Piperaceae; to Göteborg, on Urticaceae, Thymelaeaceae, Goodeniaceae; to Chicago, on Compositae, etc.; to Munich, on Amaranthaceae, Myrtaceae; etc.

Yours sincerely,