Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 8 · DO #1707 · 72_Degener_Bx7FF22_r

Collection
Otto Degener (1899–1988) papers
Item/Folder
News Items I, 1924–1940
Digital Object
DO #1707, page 8
Collection-level dates
1915–1985, n.d.
Open PDF at page 8 ↗

Page transcription

Published in the July (1934) issue of the Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, Vol. LIII, No. 3, J. E. Ackert, Editor

REVIEWS 295

FLORA HAWAIIENSIS, OR NEW ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS: by Otto Degener. Published by the author, 1932. $3.50. (Obtainable from Otto Degener at 2222 University Ave., Honolulu, T. H., or at 7 Goodrich Ave., Fieldston, Riverdale, New York City.

This is the first of a series of loose-leaf books in which the flora of the Hawaiian Islands is to be taken up in the manner of a standard manual of botany on a larger scale than one would expect from just the term manual. Description of the families and keys to the genera and species are given. The plants included are illustrated with full-page outline drawings in black and white' and a few from paintings in color, well executed to bring out the salient details for recognition. With very few exceptions, the drawings are original. Following the drawing, a rather full description of the plant is given in most cases. The type locality is indicated, the local range and finally the extra-Hawaiian range. One cannot speak too highly of the plan of the work and the fine quality of the drawings included. As succeeding issues are made, the loose-leaf arrangement permits assembly in a systematic order. The present volume includes a hundred plants distributed among various families of higher plants.—FRANK C. GATES.

TEXTBOOK OF GENERAL ZOOLOGY, Second Edition, Rewritten and Reset: by Winterton C. Curtis and Mary J. Guthrie, with the collaboration of Katharine R. Jeffers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. xv +588 pages with 438 figures. $3.75.

This work is a revision of the 1927 general zoology textbook by Winter ton C. Curtis and Mary J. Guthrie. The 21 chapters in the former work are reduced to 17 in the present one and the arrangement of the material is somewhat altered. After a brief introduction, the authors launch into the vertebrates, using the frog as a type, for the reason that the student will be more interested in an animal somewhat like himself. Next follows an excellent chapter on vertebrate organ systems related to metabolism in which are stressed the nature of protoplasm, food, digestion, assimilation and related subjects. Emphasis is placed upon endocrinology in the vertebrates. Then begins work on the cell following logically through cell division, reproduction and development to heredity and variation which are given strong treatment.

At the end of chapter seven a definite break occurs which might well be termed part two. Here begins the classification and organization of animal groups, the work proceeding from the Protozoa through the Porifera, Coelenterata, Platyhelminthes, Nematheinimthes, Molluscoidea, Trochel minthes, Annulata, Mollusca, Echinodermata to the Arthropoda. The classification is carried through classes for each of these phyla with the ex

CITIZEN TOTAL IN POPULATION SHOWS A GAIN

Number of Residents

Board of Health, Honolulu, for Past Fiscal Year. Sent to Governor

Although Hawaii's population declined 2,625 to 379,580 during the year ending June 30, 1934, the territory's citizen population registered an increase of 4,831 in the same period.

These figures are revealed in a report submitted to Governor Joseph B. Poindexter today by Dr. Frederick E. Trajer, president of the board of health. The population statistics have been compiled by the bureau of immigration and pure food.

The following tabulation shows Hawaii's population on June 30, 1934, by areas and total population with totals as of September 30, 1933:

Honolulu city 142,218 141,974
Rest of Oahu 55,028 55,028
Hilo city 15,430 15,409
Rest of Hawaii 60,903 60,502
Kauai 557 557
Maui county 58,400 58,300

Totals 379,580 378,948

The following tabulation shows comparative population figures by nativity:

Desc. June 30
Hawaiian 21,924 21,796
Asiatic-Hawn 15,704 18,250
Caucasian-Hawn 10,160 10,160
Portuguese 20,094 22,238
Puerto Rican 7,200 7,280
Spanish 1,265 2,267
Other Caucasian 55,953 45,868
Chinese 26,983 26,989
Japanese 147,507 148,024
Korean 6,644 6,638
Filipino 38,530 58,700
Others 776 711

Totals 379,580 378,948

The decrease in the Filipino population in Honolulu during the six months ending June 30 was 1,836, or more than the total decrease for the entire territory.

The following tabulation shows the citizen and non-citizen population of Hawaii, by nativity, as of June 30, 1934:

Non-
Citizens Citizens
Other Caucasians 44,303 44,043
Chinese 11,640 11,499
Filipino 13,139 43,561
Hawaiian 21,796
Japanese 105,957 42,067
Korean 3,562 2,673
Asiatic-Hawn 10,160
Caucasian-Hawn 18,169
Portuguese 27,217 2,019
Puerto Rican 7,280
Spanish 1,009 258
All others 688 23

Totals 281,613 97,335

The total of citizens compares with 278,780 on June 30, 1933, and the number aliens with 54,820 on the same date.

The decrease in population in the six months ending June 30, last,