Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 55 · DO #1710 · 72_Degener_Bx7FF25_r

Collection
Otto Degener (1899–1988) papers
Item/Folder
News Items IV, 1948–1965
Digital Object
DO #1710, page 55
Collection-level dates
1915–1985, n.d.
Open PDF at page 55 ↗

Page transcription

Hawaiian Botanical Newsletter - page 32 June 1966

COLIN POTTER, 1906 - 1966

Colin Potter, who was for thirty years the Resident Superintendent of the Foster Botanic Garden, died in Hilo on May 3, 1966. He was born in Onomea, Hawaii, and graduated from Punahou School. Mr. Potter worked as an Assistant in Botany for the Experiment Station of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association under Dr. Harold L. Lyon. He was associated with the Foster Garden since 1931 when Mrs. Mary Foster gave her home adjoining the HSPA Experiment Station's Forest Nursery to the city of Honolulu. At that time the city purchased the Forest Nursery where Mr. Potter had been employed, and the result was a public botanical park - Foster Garden.

In addition to innumerable contributions to the preservation and growth of Foster Garden, he was known for his successful breeding of ornamental varieties of "ti". Notable among his introductions was the variety, "Peter Buck". During early years failing eyesight made work difficult. He was a long-time member of the Botanical Society. Our deepest sympathy goes to Mrs. Nora Bush Potter of Volcano, Hawaii, in her loss.

A more detailed article about Colin Potter will be written by Dr. Yoneo Sagawa of the Department of Horticulture, University of Hawaii, and will appear in the Orchid Society Bulletin.


E. E. SHERFF, 1876 - 1966

Dr. Earl Edward Sherff, born in Flint, Michigan, May 18, 1876, died on May 16, 1966 in Hastings, Michigan. He graduated from Albion College and the University of Chicago, where he earned the S., M., and Ph.D. degrees, magna cum laude. In 1923 he became Instructor in Botany at Chicago Teachers College, and from 1929 until his retirement in 1951, Head of the Department of Science.

Though he never visited the far-distant Hawaiian Islands due to his devotion to his invalid son residing at home in Michigan, Dr. Sherff monographed much of the native and endemic flora of this remarkable archipelago. The genera treated are Alourites, Alsinoendron, Antidesma, Bidens, Cheirodendron, Cloaxylon, Dodonaea, Drypetes, Dubautia, Euphorbia s.l., Gnaphalium, Haplostachys, Labordia, Lagenophora, Lipocheta, Munroidendron, Nototrichium, Phyllanthus, Phyllostegia, Pittosporum, Platyesma, Railliardia, Rauvolfia, Remya, Reynoldsia, Schiedea, Sesbania, Silene, Stenogyne, Tetramolopium, Tetraplasandra, and Xylosma. This is an astounding accomplishment for any man. But, in addition to concentrating on elements in the Hawaiian flora, this erudite scholar monographed the huge genus Bidens for the World, and produced numerous taxonomic papers on genera besides those listed above.

The magnificent collections borrowed from the Marie C. Neal Herbarium of the B. P. Bishop Museum was of fundamental aid for his research which was conducted in his office in the Field Museum in Chicago. Many critical specimens, however, were never made available to him during his early studies and hence remain to plague, with provisional or no species identifications, Honolulu workers. B. P. Bishop Museum Directors A. Spoehr and R. W. Force, however, liberalized loan requirements and thus gained hundreds of hours of expert work gratis on genera monographed by Sherff during their more enlightened administrations.

Mrs. Sherff and son Mincr survive. (Otto & Isa Degener)