Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 86 · DO #1810 · 142_Payne_Schreiber_Vol.1_r

Collection
Payne, Joseph Frank (1840–1910 and Schreiber) manuscript of speech "On the 'Herbarius' and 'Hortus Sanitatis'" (Payne) and "The Herbals of the XVth and XVIth Centuries"
Item/Folder
Manuscript, 1901, 21 January 1901
Digital Object
DO #1810, page 86
Collection-level dates
21 January 1901
Open PDF at page 86 ↗

Page transcription

Passau one. As far as I know, there are 5 of the first, 3 of the second,
and only 2 of the third edition still existing. (10)

In Italy some more reprints were published, but not with the title
"Herbarius". They began with the line "Arnoldi de novis villa
Avicenna" and ended with the words:"Finit liber qui
vocatur Herbolarium de virtutibus herba-
rum". The edition which was printed in 1491 at Vicenza by Leonardus Achae-
tes de Basilea and Guil.de Papis seems to be the oldest one. An other one,
published in 1509 by Joannes and Bernardinus Rubeus at Venice, differs only
slightly from the German editions in text and general arrangement, whilst
the illustrations, though approximately of the same size as the Mainz ones,
have been drawn entirely anew. In certain cases the German original can
still be traced, generally however, the figures seem to have been drawn
from nature with considerable skill; the technique of the woodcuts however
can hardly be called particularly praiseworthy.

A similar work, but at the same time distinctly different from our
"Herbarius", was published in 1493 by J.Ph.de Lignamine in Rose, under the
title of "Herbarium Apulei Platonici". Its size is
more or less the same as that of the "Herbarius" and it spends even more
care and trouble on the curative powers of the plants. It contains 131
woodcuts, measuring 100 x 70 mm, shockingly crude, remarkable by the fact,
that on the roots of the plants very often black, snake-like winding worms
have been pictured.