Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 112 · DO #1810 · 142_Payne_Schreiber_Vol.1_r

Collection
Payne, Joseph Frank (1840–1910 and Schreiber) manuscript of speech "On the 'Herbarius' and 'Hortus Sanitatis'" (Payne) and "The Herbals of the XVth and XVIth Centuries"
Item/Folder
Manuscript, 1901, 21 January 1901
Digital Object
DO #1810, page 112
Collection-level dates
21 January 1901
Open PDF at page 112 ↗

Page transcription

gleichan ist gewesen. Uff das ich aber dann truch besorgt, Hebe ich mit
bitt und von desu vermocht gelert lant, Sie der Artzney und das lateins
kündig gewesen sind, die dies buch corrigiert haben... denn es sein nit
minder dann sechs tausend irthuob darummen kunnen.") In spite of these
5000 eliminated errors, young Grüninger's edition makes, outwardly seen,
an even worse impression, as the section about herbs is not illustrated
at all, while the rest only contains a few pictures, more than 30 years old,
of distillation apparatus and medical instruments.

Not only the woodblocks copied from the two Hortus editions had a
considerable span of life at Strasbourg, but also the pictures of the Har-
barius were given new life there, in particular those, that were in the
edition, produced by Johann and Conrad Hiest at Spayer. We meet them in a
work by Petrus de Crescentis, entitled:"Von dem/ nutz der ding die in Moko-
ren gebuwt werd..." ("About the usefulness of things that are planted in
fields..") In the first edition, which the printer Johann Knoblouch made
his colleague Johannes Schott print in 1512, the chapter numbers, which I
have mentioned earlier, were still visible on most of the woodcuts; in the
second one however, which Hans Knoblouch the younger printed in 1531, the
numbers have all been eliminated.

II

The beginning of scientific research.
Whereas up to now our impressions of Strasbourg have been rather unfavour-
able, we shall now see this town as the place, at which a thorough change
in botanical science took its start. At the same time at which Beck, Grün-
ninger and Knoblouch still offered their readers illustrations that were
between 30 and 45 years old, their colleague Hans Schott published the
herbal of Otto Brunfels, which in text and illustrations is far superior
to all its predecessors.