Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 121 · DO #1810 · 142_Payne_Schreiber_Vol.1_r

Collection
Payne, Joseph Frank (1840–1910 and Schreiber) manuscript of speech "On the 'Herbarius' and 'Hortus Sanitatis'" (Payne) and "The Herbals of the XVth and XVIth Centuries"
Item/Folder
Manuscript, 1901, 21 January 1901
Digital Object
DO #1810, page 121
Collection-level dates
21 January 1901
Open PDF at page 121 ↗

Page transcription

with a polemic pamphlet, bearing the grand title: "Apologia, qua refellit molitiosas H. Ryffii, veteratoris possimi reprehensiones, quae illo Dioscoridi nuper ex Egenolphi officina prodeunti attixuit". This booklet was printed in 1544 by Isangrin and sent to Frankfurt, so as to be sold there at the fair. Egenolff however had heard of this plan, and by an agent he bought up the whole edition. This of course increased Fuchs' rage and in 1545 he wrote a new leaflet, to which he gave the title: "Adversus mendacnes et christianos homines indignes Christiani Egenolphi cuique architecti columnae Leonh. Fuchsi medici responsio". Now the Marburg professor Janus Cornarius stood up and directed three pamphlets against Fuchs, which appeared in 1545 and 1546 at Egenolff's. The first one bears the title "Vulpacule excorista" (alluding to the name Fuchs = fox); it was followed by "Mitra no Brabyla, pro Vulpacule excoriste esservanda" and later by the so-called "Fuchseides III", which, apart from the first two pamphlets, contained a final section with the title "Vulpacules catastrophe, seu qui debet esse scopus, modus ac fructus contemptionum".

In spite of all these disputes, Fuchs really knew quite well, that the reason for the bad sale of his book was not competition by others, but its huge size and big price. So he made Isangrin copy the woodblocks in a smaller size, and these woodcuts, reduced to a height of some 120 cm and very neatly cut produce an excellent impression. They first appeared in pocket size in 1545, without text, only with their Latin and German names and arranged so that there was a separate page for each of the 516 plant-pictures. But Fuchs had to give vent to his rage and put in a preface, from which I quote, with some abbreviations, the following sentences:

"Two years ago I published in print a new herbal. But as this herbal, because of its size, can only be used at home, I have produced this handbook