Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 131 · DO #1810 · 142_Payne_Schreiber_Vol.1_r

Collection
Payne, Joseph Frank (1840–1910 and Schreiber) manuscript of speech "On the 'Herbarius' and 'Hortus Sanitatis'" (Payne) and "The Herbals of the XVth and XVIth Centuries"
Item/Folder
Manuscript, 1901, 21 January 1901
Digital Object
DO #1810, page 131
Collection-level dates
21 January 1901
Open PDF at page 131 ↗

Page transcription

I'll give more details about this edition in a later paragraph, where some other Frankfurt herbals are to be mentioned; for the moment I have to say a word about Conrad Gesner, who used to be called the German Plinius. The home of this excellent physician and scientist was Zürich, and originally he owes his reputation to his "History of the Animal World" (Geschichte des Tierreiches), of which the first instalments appeared in 1550 at Froschauer's in Zürich, whilst the last part was only published 30 years after his death. His herbal was quite unfinished, when he died at Zürich in 1565, but he left behind a lot of preliminary work on it. The significance and merits of this remarkable scientist were first appreciated by J. Simler in a pamphlet, printed at Zürich in 1566, entitled: "Vita philosophi et medici Conradi Gesneri"; later part of the plant-pictures, left behind by him, were made known to the world, as I have just said, by Gomeraius, but a complete edition of them only appeared in Nuremberg in 1754 at K.K.Schmiddel's. Gesner was the first person to classify the plants according to the peculiarities of their flowers and seeds into species and families, creating thus the first foundation for modern botany. He gave expression to this idea in his illustrations by adding enlarged pictures of flowers and seeds to each plant, a procedure which was imitated in most of the later herbals.

Publishers' activities at Frankfurt.
We now have to turn back a little to study the situation at Frankfurt. We already know, that Egenolff by no means had a monopoly there; all the same, we shall first consider exclusively his publications. Incidentally, F.W.E. Roth published in the XIXth volume of the "Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen" a bibliographical study about the various editions of Egenolff's herbals.