Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 133 · DO #1810 · 142_Payne_Schreiber_Vol.1_r

Collection
Payne, Joseph Frank (1840–1910 and Schreiber) manuscript of speech "On the 'Herbarius' and 'Hortus Sanitatis'" (Payne) and "The Herbals of the XVth and XVIth Centuries"
Item/Folder
Manuscript, 1901, 21 January 1901
Digital Object
DO #1810, page 133
Collection-level dates
21 January 1901
Open PDF at page 133 ↗

Page transcription

Egonolf printed in 1551 the first volume of Lonicer's "Historiae naturalis apud novum"; it was the second volume of this work which brought its author four years later the present of an taler from the Frankfurt council, which we have already mentioned. When Resselin, whose herbal has meanwhile appeared in seven editions, died in 1554, the vacant post of the Frankfurt physician was offered to Lonicer, and he got married to one of Egonolf's daughters, named Magdalene. He now turns his attention to the herbal written by his predecessor, which he edited in its old version (four times between 1557 and 1577) as well as in a completely revised version, which bore his own name. It was this latter work, which gave him some kind of immortality during two centuries. Having been published in seven of eight editions during his lifetime (he died in 1586), it was printed another twelve times up to 1703. It is particularly interesting, that even in the last editions there still are many plant illustrations taken over from the first edition (the woodblocks were taken from Frankfurt to Ulm, from there to Nuremberg and then to Augsburg), also some animal-pictures, which Jost Amman had drawn for the "Tierbuch" (Animal Book), which was published by Feyrbond in 1589.

Egonolf, who had died in 1555, did not see Lonicer's herbal published; publication only was completed in 1557 by "Egonolf's Erben" (Egonolf's heirs), amongst whom Lonicer, being his son-in-law, was himself. For the illustrations use was mainly made of Resselin's herbal pictures and of the rather inferior Marburg Dioscorides pictures. The latter however began to fade out already in the next edition and none of them were kept until the later centuries. Apart from these there are also some woodcuts, for which Rock's herbal must have been the model. Of course Rendel's drawings were not simply copies, but his method was imitated and living beings were used to animate the drawings. So for instance we see beside the apple-tree Adam