Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 66 · DO #268 · 204_Popenoe_Bx18FF266r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Popenoe, John and Jeri, 12 March 1959–18 July 1974
Digital Object
DO #268, page 66
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 66 ↗

Page transcription

11.

is commonly used; while in Florida the native D. virginiana is preferred. This has been tried experimentally in Central America and does not seem as promising as D. kaki. It suckers very freely; it is not rare to find root suckers appearing 20 or 30 feet away from the kaki tree which was grafted on a rootstock of this species.

Trees may be shield budded like citrus, or cleft grafted. For shield budding, stocks should be about half an inch in diameter and buds somewhat more than an inch in length. When cleft grafted, it should be remembered that in the tropics generally it has been found that scions should not be too long; they should not protrude more than a couple of inches - one or two nodes - above the graft.

So few kakis have been planted in tropical America that cultural data based on experience are lacking. It seems obvious, however, that the trees will not need to be planted farther apart than 18 or at most 20 feet. For planting in the orchard, George C. Roeding of California writes: "The tap-root should be cut back to 18 inches, and fresh cuts made on all the fibrous roots. After the trees are set, head them back at least one-half. In the second, third and fourth years pruning of the tree should be continued to fashion it into the typical goblet form."

On poor soils, it is recommended to fertilize the trees, nitrogen being the element most needed. Probably a program suitable for oranges would be better, in order to play safe. While it has been stated that grafted kaki trees should come into bearing at four years of age, this has not been the case in tropical America. Because they usually are planted at considerable elevations, they do not have hot summers to produce the rapid growth which is characteristic of important kaki-growing regions.

Kaki fruits cannot well be left on the tree until fully ripe