Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 66 · DO #2699 · 48_20th%20Century%20Botanists_Bx6FF73r

Collection
Twentieth Century Botanists correspondence and other materials
Item/Folder
Recipient Unknown from F.W. Oliver, 1940–1949
Digital Object
DO #2699, page 66
Collection-level dates
1873–1970
Open PDF at page 66 ↗

Page transcription

1 FEB, 49
Dear Prof. Curtis,
Your book arrived. The other day I wrote an event, really, I mean the constant illustration throughout by Martin Blenner. It was I think my father who came to Boston in 1864 bought me his "Climbing Plants in Boston" followed him up a few years later by an Indian Expedition. Indian plants were solicited throughout the continent. The text remained much as in the original. Lelo came an Indian botanist to New York sometime. My father said "Congratulations on your book; odd things met with, he has heard of your visit to India." My father then explained that inside the New York Botanical Garden there was no room for global botany; all the data were conveniently available in the library cases. The point was that my father's central position had enabled him always to bring as subjects the plants which he had collected in India for access to students in any part of the continent. Then 2 books, circulates for 50 or 60 years together 50,000 was 70,000 copies. - as I discovered when handling the file of annual returns from the publisher. Your book is very bright, you may stress the excellence of the illustrations; typography also. Arizona (p. 259) to illustrate fentucis - a stroke of genius! "Good time never too busy" - but I suppose the publisher was thinking of its circulation in the large adjacent continent when he secured the "foreword".
Strung the rather silly "In your list flow to the Silver Tree (Dendrocydium argenteum)" planted and where? years ago a S. African correspondent sent me some fruits of this tree. On ripening the pericarp comes away from the mesocarp, slips up the style, is arrested by an expanded stigma, and appears to serve as a species of parachute. What I ask is that might be useful in dispersal.