Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 96 · DO #382 · 204_Popenoe_Bx29FF381r

Collection
Wilson Popenoe (1892–1975) family papers
Item/Folder
Whitman, Edmund S. and Sigrid, 15 May 1957–12 April 1973
Digital Object
DO #382, page 96
Collection-level dates
1882–1975
Open PDF at page 96 ↗

Page transcription

May 27, 1960.

Ing. Alfredo J. Sacasa, Gerente General
Dr. Wilson Popenoe, Director Emeritus, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana
Suggestions and Recommendations on Fruit Program.

THE SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS offered in this report are the result of (1) experience in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, and (2) a brief survey carried out during the last half of May 1960, by Wilson Popenoe and Ing. Edmundo Astorga, as outlined in the attached memorandum. In conducting this survey we had the valuable assistance, at various times, of Aquiles Gonzales, Ing. Horacio Wheelock, and Francisco Urbina, as well as numerous agriculturists and horticulturists who willingly showed us their properties and discussed their problems.

The program here suggested has intentionally been limited to what we believe, at the present time, are the most promising fields of action. Two of the projects might reasonably be expected to yield results of commercial importance in approximately two years; these are bananas and the manufacture of fruit juices, jams and jellies. Increased production of tree fruits such as better mangos, and aguacates which will mature during months when no aguacates are now available in local markets, will take more time; as also the development of temperate zone fruits such as plums and peaches, for which at least five years experimentation will be necessary.

It may be well to emphasise that in many instances, development of fruit culture will have to begin by increasing production of good fruit for local markets. As time goes on and the supply increases, some of these fruits can attain commercial importance for exportation, most probably in processed form.

The field here for increased production of good fruits would seem to be a promising one, for the following reasons: (1) There are plenty of areas where the soils are satisfactory, some areas for one fruit, others for another fruit.