Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation
A Research Division of Carnegie Mellon University

Hunt Institute Archives Text Discovery Platform

Search a large and growing portion of our online collections, including handwritten documents.
PROTOTYPE

This prototype uses state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, including a vision-language model (VLM) capable of reading handwritten documents as well as typed and printed text, to create searchable transcriptions of digitized materials in the Hunt Institute Archives. This makes it possible to search the textual contents of individual pages, including material that may not be described in the archival catalog.

Use Keyword search for specific words, names, dates, scientific names, or phrases. Try Semantic search (experimental) to describe a topic, question, or kind of material when you do not know the exact wording used in the documents.

About the AI-generated transcriptions

The transcriptions are generated automatically from page images and may contain errors, especially with difficult handwriting, unusual names, multiple languages, image-quality problems, or complex layouts. They are intended primarily as a discovery aid rather than authoritative transcriptions.

Each result provides the generated transcription and links to the original digitized material and associated archival description so that readings can be checked against the source. The transcription workflow uses AI models run locally by the Hunt Institute.

About Keyword and Semantic search

Keyword search is the default and matches the wording in the transcriptions. Results contain all your terms. Use quotes for an exact phrase. Substring matching is supported, so aceae can find plant-family names ending in -aceae.

Semantic search (experimental) is useful when you know what kind of material you are looking for but do not know the words used in the documents. It ranks transcribed passages by similarity of meaning, so relevant results may not contain the exact words in your query.

Semantic queries can be broad research topics, descriptions of activities or relationships, or natural-language questions. For example:

Semantic search is not a chatbot: a question is used as a search query, and the system returns archival passages that appear conceptually related to it rather than generating an answer or summary. Short descriptions and ordinary research questions generally work better than lists of disconnected keywords. Quotation marks have no special meaning in Semantic mode. Cross-language matching may work in some cases, but it should not be treated as translation.

Keyword and Semantic search are complementary. Keyword search lets you require particular wording; Semantic search can surface differently worded passages about the same subject. Depending on the research question, trying both can reveal different useful material.

Open a result: use the prominent page-and-transcription link to see the metadata, PDF, and full transcription. Keyword-search terms are highlighted in the transcription.

Archives Collections Database (ArchivesSpace): the Collection, Item/Folder, and Digital Object links open the corresponding archival records. Collection-level dates describe the collection as a whole, not necessarily the specific item or page.

If a PDF does not load: on the detail page, use the Digital Object link, click “Go to file” in ArchivesSpace, and navigate to the page number shown here.

Current limitations
  • Automated transcriptions can contain missing or incorrect text or unintended repetition. Difficult handwriting, image quality, unusual layouts, and multiple languages can reduce accuracy. Always consult the original page image when an exact reading matters.
  • Semantic search remains experimental. Its rankings are an additional discovery aid, not a complete or definitive set of relevant results, and highly ranked pages can sometimes be only broadly related.
  • This is an active prototype. Search coverage, transcriptions, functionality, and the interface may continue to change as additional archival material is processed and the system is improved.

← Back to results

Page 77 · DO #3931 · 296_Lowy_Bx2FF25_r

Collection
Bernard Lowy (1916–1992) papers
Item/Folder
Correspondence - Herbaria. Etc. 1981→'85; Kobayasi, Ryvarden - Parmasto/Raitvirr - Ainsworth; Zang Mu, Wong - Thiereb-1972 - Walden; S.J. Gould-1985., May 1972 – June 1985
Digital Object
DO #3931, page 77
Collection-level dates
1949–1990
Open PDF at page 77 ↗

Page transcription

Department of Botany
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE
BATON ROUGE · LOUISIANA · 70803
504/388-8485

1-II-1980

Mr. Gregory M. Mueller
Department of Botany
The University of Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee 37916

Dear Mr. Mueller:

I am very pleased to hear about your proposed monograph on Laccaria, to be done in collaboration with Ron Petersen, and that you plan to collect intensively in the Baton Rouge area as well as elsewhere in Louisiana and the Gulf Coast. Although over the years I have collected many fungi here, my studies have been confined largely to the Tremellales, and most of the Agaricales still await professional attention. So it is good to know that this region will be the target of an investigation that is very likely to add significantly to our knowledge of the fungus flora. Since Laccaria is mycorrhizal, much new data will undoubtedly emerge.

Beginning probably late in August and continuing throughout the remainder of the year, I expect to join a team in the Brazilian Amazon for mycological field work there. In the event that I must leave before your arrival, I shall arrange to have my laboratory placed at your disposal, so that you may plan to have the use of a microscope, a dryer, and such other facilities as you may require to successfully carry on your work. Be sure to let me know the approximate date of your arrival, and I shall arrange the necessary details.

With best wishes to you and Ron,

Sincerely yours,
Bernard Lowe
Professor of Botany &
Curator, Mycological Herbarium

NO reply; Presumably not coming.